Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor | Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет | |
dc.contributor.author | Kosheleva Olga | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kreinovich Vladik | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Servin Christian | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-03T11:48:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-03T11:48:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/172917 | |
dc.description.abstract | If most students comment that the course was too fast, a natural idea is to slow it down. If most students comment that the course was too slow, a natural idea is to speed it up. But what if half the students think the speed was too fast and half that the speed was too slow? A frequent reaction to such a situation is to conclude that the speed was just right and not change the speed the next time, but this may not be the right reaction: under the same speed, half of the students will struggle and may fail. A better reaction is to provide additional help to struggling students, e.g., in the form of extra practice assignments. How can we do it without adding more work to instructors - who are usually already overworked? A natural idea is to explicitly make some assignments required only for those who did not do well on the last test or quiz - this way, good students will have fewer required tasks and thus, we can keep the same amount of grading. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Математическое образование в школе и вузе: опыт, проблемы, перспективы (MATHEDU'2022) | ru_RU |
dc.subject | Student evaluations | en_US |
dc.subject | special assignments for struggling students | en_US |
dc.subject | special assignments for advanced students | en_US |
dc.title | HOW TO REACT TO STUDENT EVALUATIONS | en_US |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.udk | 371 | |
dc.description.pages | 201-204 |