dc.contributor |
Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kosheleva Olga |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Kreinovich Vladik |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Servin Christian |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-08-03T11:48:13Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-08-03T11:48:13Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/172917 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
If most students comment that the course was too fast, a natural idea is to slow it down. If most students comment that the course was too slow, a natural idea is to speed it up. But what if half the students think the speed was too fast and half that the speed was too slow? A frequent reaction to such a situation is to conclude that the speed was just right and not change the speed the next time, but this may not be the right reaction: under the same speed, half of the students will struggle and may fail. A better reaction is to provide additional help to struggling students, e.g., in the form of extra practice assignments. How can we do it without adding more work to instructors - who are usually already overworked? A natural idea is to explicitly make some assignments required only for those who did not do well on the last test or quiz - this way, good students will have fewer required tasks and thus, we can keep the same amount of grading. |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Математическое образование в школе и вузе: опыт, проблемы, перспективы (MATHEDU'2022) |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Student evaluations |
en_US |
dc.subject |
special assignments for struggling students |
en_US |
dc.subject |
special assignments for advanced students |
en_US |
dc.title |
HOW TO REACT TO STUDENT EVALUATIONS |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
|
dc.identifier.udk |
371 |
|
dc.description.pages |
201-204 |
|