Abstract:
© 2019 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier B.V. and Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS This paper aims to evaluate potential biostratigraphic markers for the Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary in sections of Europe and Asia, to help identify the base of the global Serpukhovian Stage, which is a high priority task for Carboniferous biostratigraphy. Sections in the Serpukhovian stratotype area in the Moscow Basin contain a gap at the base of the Tarusian Regional Substage (basal in the classical Serpukhovian), so the traditional boundary defined in these sections cannot be precisely correlated with other successions worldwide. The IUGS Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the traditional Viséan–Serpukhovian boundary focused on the search for a new boundary marker, primarily on the first appearance datum (FAD) of the conodont Lochriea ziegleri in the lineage Lochriea nodosa to Lochriea ziegleri, considering it to be a suitable biostratigraphic event. The FOD (first occurrence datum) of L. ziegleri has been recognized in many successions worldwide, although only in a few sections the supposed evolutionary lineage of L. ziegleri was inferred. There are serious impediments to the FAD of L. ziegleri being universally accepted as the boundary marker. This paper presents a review of the FOD levels of L. ziegleri documented so far from multiple sections along with other correlatable markers (foraminifers and ammonoids) that can serve as additional points of reference in sections where a conodont record is poor or absent. The reviewed sections are Naqing Section (South China), Verkhnyaya Kardailovka and Kugarchi sections (South Urals, Russia), Mariinsky Log and Ladeinaya Mountain Sections (western slope of the Middle Urals, Russia), Novogurovsky Section (Moscow Basin, Russia), Vegas de Sotres Section (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain), Lugasnaghta Section (County Leitrim, Ireland), Wenne River Bank Section (Germany), and Milivojevića Kamenjar Section (Družetić NW Serbia). We also included a compilation of data from sections of North England and southern Scotland. In this paper, we will mainly focus on newly described sections, while the discussion of most previously described sections was summarized by Nikolaeva et al. (2001, 2002, 2005, 2009b) and other publications, so they are only briefly mentioned in this review. It should be added that there is no such a thing as a perfect GSSP section, as each section has certain disadvantages, either lithological, paleontological, or both, so it is important to hear and discuss all the different opinions to develop the optimum strategy for future research. In addition, we analyze published records from several sites in North England and southern Scotland. We discuss the first appearances of the ammonoid genera Cravenoceras, Edmooroceras, Lyrogoniatites, Dombarites, and Platygoniatites, the foraminifers Neoarchaediscus postrugosus, Hemidiscopsis muradymica, H. hemisphaerica, species of Janischewskina and Monotaxinoides, Eostaffella pseudostruvei group, Eostaffellina decurta, and Endothyranopsis plana. We publish here for the first time the useful accounts of foraminifers and conodonts from the Mariinsky Log Section and Ladeinaya Mountain Section (Middle Urals, Russia), and re-figure several important type specimens from Europe and the Urals.
