Abstract:
An attempt to find out the conditions of mastering one's own freedom through a choice leads to the concretization of a thinking situation itself. Indeed, we are not always ready to choose. The latter appears in different ways: as an instant flash, as a long agonizing process, suffering, as an indifferent, spontaneous pressing of the corresponding "right" keys. The issues inevitably arise in connection with a choice subjectification1 and objectification. The irony is that reality does not tolerate a delay almost always. It is merciless to our attempts to make an unnamed decision. This solution must have an "author". He can not neglect his identity. I.e., a choice should coincide with the most diverse components of human nature and random meanings and accents up to the mystical movement of a soul. But the genuine "authorship" of choice does not mean that it is shared and agreed by us. There are some solutions taken in spite of. Should this be considered as the will of a subject?
