Kazan Federal University Digital Repository

Text complexity predictors: methods and approaches for assessment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Казанский федеральный университет
dc.contributor.author Гатиятуллина Галия Маратовна
dc.contributor.author Солнышкина Марина Ивановна
dc.contributor.author Куприянов Роман Владимирович
dc.contributor.author Зиганшина Чулпан Рифовна
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-10T07:24:24Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-10T07:24:24Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Gatiyatullina G. M. Lexical density as a complexity predictor: the case of Science and Social Studies textbooks, Research Result / G. M. Gatiyatullina, M. I. Solnyshkina, R. V. Kupriyanov, C. R. Ziganshina // Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. - 2023. Is. 9 (1). - P. 11-26. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-1-0-2
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/175725
dc.description.abstract . An ever-increasing need for quality textbooks and objective linguistic expertise encourages more intensive research into complexity of academic discourse. The current research focuses on lexical density viewed as an effective complexity predictor and defined as the ratio of content words per number of words in a text. Being predominantly quantitative, the study also examines dynamics of Flesh Kincaid grade levels and ratios of parts of speech across 12 Science and Social Studies textbooks taught in Grades 7 - 12 of American schools. The analysis shows a consistent pattern of strong positive growth of nouns and adjectives across grade levels, while lexical verbal elements slightly decrease across the textbooks. The total adverb count changes slightly, and its movement vector depends on the discourse: it rises in Social Studies textbooks and is stable in Science textbooks. This multidirectional movement of components in Lexical density structure explains its marginal increase across the grades in Science and Social Studies discourse. The findings indicate discourse sophistication increase realized predominantly in text nominalization. We also discuss challenges which nominalization presents for comprehension of academic texts by readers and suggest that provided with reference values of text complexity features, educators receive a reliable tool to select reading texts and assess their suitability for target learner groups. The findings can be beneficial for textbooks authors, exam material developers and discourse researchers.
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Научный результат. Вопросы теоретической и прикладной лингвистики
dc.rights открытый доступ
dc.subject Lexical density; Readability; Text complexity; Textbooks; Science; Social studies
dc.title Text complexity predictors: methods and approaches for assessment
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.org Институт филологии и межкультурной коммуникации
dc.description.pages 11-26
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume Т. 9, №1. 2023
dc.pub-id 279162
dc.identifier.doi 10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-1-0-2


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics