Kazan Federal University Digital Repository

Active scars in clinical presentation of postoperative persistent syndrome (Failed back surgery syndrome)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Esin R.G.
dc.contributor.author Khakimova A.A.
dc.contributor.author Esin O.R.
dc.contributor.author Khairullin I.K.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-09T20:47:39Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-09T20:47:39Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 2219-5297
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/170332
dc.description.abstract Objective. To assess the role of postoperative scar trigger zones in patients with postoperative persistent syndrome (POPS), effec-tiveness of lidocaine/prilocaine cream and manual treatment methods. Material and methods. Three groups of patients were examined and treated: 1) «early POPS» (e-POPS, n=23), pain after surgery decreased, but continued to significantly disturb the patient; 2) «middle POPS» (m-POPS, n=42), complete regression of pain af-ter surgery with subsequent recurrence within 6—12 months; 3) «late POPS» (l-POPS, n=31) — pain relapse occurred later than 12 months after surgery. Examination included manual diagnosis of skin and soft tissue thresholds within the scar area, tensoalgom-etry with a 1 mm2 nozzle. Treatment included 2 stages: 1) lidocaine/prilocaine cream application on postoperative scar for 2 hours daily for 5 days; 2) manual therapy with soft tissue stretching and pressure. Results. All patients showed a decrease in physiological barrier of skin and soft tissues around the scar by 5—10 mm. Tensoal-gometry revealed scar trigger zones (STZ) in all patients of the e-POPS group with reproduction (complete or partial) of typical pain pattern. The same STZs were found in all patients of other subgroups, but pain pattern reproduction was found in a smaller number of patients (m-POPS subgroup — 13 out of 42, l-POPS subgroup — 2 out of 31). Tensoalgometry data (kg/cm2): e-POPS before treatment — 21.2±12.5, after the first stage of treatment — 64.3±19.5 (p=0.00045), after the second stage of treatment — 87.6±13.5 (p=0.0054); m-POPS before treatment — 51.5±23.2, after the first stage of treatment — 71.5±31.7 (p=0.0054), after the second stage of treatment — 91.4±34.9 (p=0.0043); l-POPS before treatment — 61.3±33.6, after the first stage of treatment — 81.7±41.7 (p=0.035), after the second stage of treatment — 88.7±42.5 (p>0.05). Conclusion. Lidocaine/prilocaine cream showed a good analgesic effect for 4 hours in all patients. Manual therapy also significantly increased pain thresholds, except for the l-POPS group. These patients had a significant effect after lidocaine/prilocaine cream application. The authors recommend lidocaine/prilocaine cream in addition to conventional manual therapy for the treatment of active scars. This cream is characterized by high efficacy, safety and good tolerance.
dc.relation.ispartofseries Russian Journal of Pain
dc.subject Active scars
dc.subject EMLA
dc.subject Failed back surgery syndrome
dc.subject Lidocaine/prilocaine
dc.subject postoperative persistent syndrome
dc.title Active scars in clinical presentation of postoperative persistent syndrome (Failed back surgery syndrome)
dc.type Article
dc.relation.ispartofseries-issue 3
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume 19
dc.collection Публикации сотрудников КФУ
dc.relation.startpage 21
dc.source.id SCOPUS22195297-2021-19-3-SID85118155384


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Публикации сотрудников КФУ Scopus [24551]
    Коллекция содержит публикации сотрудников Казанского федерального (до 2010 года Казанского государственного) университета, проиндексированные в БД Scopus, начиная с 1970г.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics