Электронный архив

Microbial Communities and Functions in the Rhizosphere of Disease-Resistant and Susceptible Camellia spp.

Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.author Li J.
dc.contributor.author Zhang C.
dc.contributor.author Qu X.
dc.contributor.author Luo Z.
dc.contributor.author Lu S.
dc.contributor.author Kuzyakov Y.
dc.contributor.author Alharbi H.A.
dc.contributor.author Yuan J.
dc.contributor.author Niu G.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-09T20:44:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-09T20:44:15Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/169926
dc.description.abstract Oil tea (Camellia spp.) is endemic to the hilly regions in the subtropics. Camellia yuhsienensis is resistant to diseases such as anthracnose and root rot, while Camellia oleifera is a high-yield species but susceptible to these diseases. We hypothesize that differences in the rhizosphere microbial communities and functions will elucidate the resistance mechanisms of these species. We used high-throughput sequencing over four seasons to characterize the rhizosphere microbiome of C. oleifera (Rhizo-Sus) and C. yuhsienensis (Rhizo-Res) and of the bulk soil control (BulkS). In Rhizo-Res, bacterial richness and diversity (Shannon index) in autumn and winter were both higher than that in Rhizo-Sus. In Rhizo-Res, fungal richness in autumn and winter and diversity in summer, autumn, and winter were higher than that in Rhizo-Sus. The seasonal variations in bacterial community structure were different, while that of fungal community structure were similar between Rhizo-Res and Rhizo-Sus. Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic, and stress-tolerant bacteria were the dominant groups in Rhizo-Sus, while Gram-negative bacteria were the dominant group in Rhizo-Res. The significant differences in bacterial and fungal functions between Rhizo-Sus and Rhizo-Res were as follows: (1) in Rhizo-Sus, there were three bacterial and four fungal groups with plant growth promoting potentials, such as Brevibacterium epidermidis and Oidiodendron maius, and one bacterium and three fungi with pathogenic potentials, such as Gryllotalpicola sp. and Cyphellophora sessilis; (2) in Rhizo-Res, there were also three bacteria and four fungal groups with plant-growth-promoting potentials (e.g., Acinetobacter lwoffii and Cenococcum geophilum) but only one phytopathogen (Schizophyllum commune). In summary, the rhizosphere microbiome of disease-resistant C. yuhsienensis is characterized by a higher richness and diversity of microbial communities, more symbiotic fungal communities, and fewer pathogens compared to the rhizosphere of high-yield but disease-susceptible C. oleifera.
dc.subject Camellia oleifera
dc.subject Camellia yuhsienensis
dc.subject plant growth promoting microorganisms
dc.subject rhizosphere microbiome and functions
dc.subject soilborne phytopathogens
dc.title Microbial Communities and Functions in the Rhizosphere of Disease-Resistant and Susceptible Camellia spp.
dc.type Article
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume 12
dc.collection Публикации сотрудников КФУ
dc.source.id SCOPUS-2021-12-SID85118330431


Файлы в этом документе

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

  • Публикации сотрудников КФУ Scopus [24551]
    Коллекция содержит публикации сотрудников Казанского федерального (до 2010 года Казанского государственного) университета, проиндексированные в БД Scopus, начиная с 1970г.

Показать сокращенную информацию

Поиск в электронном архиве


Расширенный поиск

Просмотр

Моя учетная запись

Статистика