Improving watershed-based pore-network extraction method using maximum inscribed ball pore-body positioning

Abstract

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Pore-scale modeling is a rapidly evolving area of research because modeling multiphase flow directly on 3D pore geometries is of utmost importance in wide variety of research areas, including oil and gas development, hydrology and material sciences. Although there are numerous methods to model flow, only so-called pore-network models are computationally effective enough to perform simulations in large modeling domains, and they are orders of magnitude faster than direct modeling approaches. However, pore-network models require a simplification of the 3D pore geometry to perform simulations, which are usually referred to as pore-network extraction. Such extraction poses a separate problem because it must provide an accurate description of the pore space geometry and topology. Different methods have been proposed in the literature. Recently, watershed-based approaches have been popular due to their effectiveness in working with porous media images of any porosity. A watershed algorithm requires seed placement to segment the space into distinct pores. We propose a hybrid algorithm combining the power of watersheds in finding intersections between pores with the advantages of the maximum inscribed ball technique, which is very effective in finding pore centers. We rigorously verify and test our novel methodology on artificial and X-ray microtomography images of wide variety of porous materials: sphere packings, carbonate, soil, ceramic and sandstone samples. Comparison against a purely watershed-based method and results based solely on the maximum inscribed balls–based method (in terms of pore/throat total number, pore size distributions and connection statistics, and multiphase flow properties including capillary curves and relative permeabilities) revealed the accuracy of our novel technique, consistency with existing classical techniques and great potential in analysing 3D pore images of any complexity. On the other hand, comparison of extracted pore-network topology (as based on Euler number) revealed significant differences between different methodologies, which is rather surprising considering the similarities in two-phase flow properties. While analysing permeability results, we also compared two popular pore-throat partitioning models and advocated in favor of the weight model usually utilized within watershed-based extracted pore networks. Our results illuminate problems in current pore-network models and outline some potential ways to improve their accuracy in future research.