Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor.author | Novoselov O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmetov F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Igtisamov R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Husainov V. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-15T22:10:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-15T22:10:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/156805 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019, Dorma Journals. All rights reserved. The recent concept of "technology" (high, efficient, innovative, digital) has overshadowed the use of the concept of "labor", "organization of labor". The analysis shows that the question of “labor organization” has lost its theoretical content and transformed, in fact, into the concept of “self-organization of labor”. This circumstance can be considered one of the reasons for the decline in the prestige of working professions and, as a consequence, the observed shortage of skilled workers, including in construction. The publication provides examples that argue the desirability of continuing the theory of the scientific organization of labor of workers in construction, as one of the branches of construction science. The subject of this study is the relationship of modern construction science to one of the aspects of construction production-the organization of labor of construction workers. | |
dc.subject | Construction | |
dc.subject | Labor | |
dc.subject | Personnel | |
dc.subject | Science | |
dc.subject | Workers | |
dc.title | Liberalization of labour organization of construction workers: Legitimacy of attitude or underestimation of the issue | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries-issue | Special Issue | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume | 7 | |
dc.collection | Публикации сотрудников КФУ | |
dc.relation.startpage | 1121 | |
dc.source.id | SCOPUS-2019-7--SID85076924051 |