Электронный архив

Budesonide Suppositories Are Effective and Safe for Treating Acute Ulcerative Proctitis

Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.author Kruis W.
dc.contributor.author Neshta V.
dc.contributor.author Pesegova M.
dc.contributor.author Alekseeva O.
dc.contributor.author Andreev P.
dc.contributor.author Datsenko O.
dc.contributor.author Levchenko O.
dc.contributor.author Abdulkhakov S.
dc.contributor.author Lozynskyy Y.
dc.contributor.author Mostovoy Y.
dc.contributor.author Soloviev K.
dc.contributor.author Dorofeyev A.
dc.contributor.author Vieth M.
dc.contributor.author Stiess M.
dc.contributor.author Greinwald R.
dc.contributor.author Mohrbacher R.
dc.contributor.author Siegmund B.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-15T21:47:55Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-15T21:47:55Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.issn 1542-3565
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/156025
dc.description.abstract © 2019 AGA Institute Background & Aims: Although proctitis is the most limited form of ulcerative colitis, it causes unpleasant symptoms. Topical mesalamine, the standard treatment, is not always effective. We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial to determine the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of a budesonide suppository vs mesalamine suppositories vs combined budesonide and mesalamine suppositories for proctitis. Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial in 337 patients with active proctitis to compare the efficacies of 4 different suppository treatments. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 2 mg budesonide suppositories (2 mg BUS; n = 89 patients), 4 mg BUS (n = 79), 1 g mesalamine suppositories (1 g MES; n = 81), or the combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (n = 88). The study was performed from November 2013 through July 2015 at 36 study sites in Europe and Russia. The primary end point was the time to resolution of clinical symptoms, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Results: The mean time to resolution of symptoms in the 4 mg BUS (29.8 days) and combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (29.3 days) groups resembled that of the standard 1 g MES treatment (29.2 days), but was significantly longer in the 2 mg BUS group (35.5 days). Furthermore, proportions of patients with deep, clinical, and endoscopic remission, as well as mucosal healing, were similar among the 1 g MES, 4 mg BUS, and combination therapy groups, but significantly lower in the group that received 2 mg BUS. No safety signals were observed, and the patients’ treatment acceptance was high (67%–85% of patients). Conclusions: In a multicenter randomized trial, we found that the efficacy and safety of 4 mg BUS in treatment of active proctitis did not differ significantly from those of 1 g MES. Budesonide suppositories offer an alternative therapy to mesalamine for topical treatment of proctitis. Clinicaltrialsregister.eu no: 2012-003362-41.
dc.relation.ispartofseries Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
dc.subject Inflammatory Bowel Disease
dc.subject Mesalazine
dc.subject RCT
dc.subject Ulcerative Colitis
dc.title Budesonide Suppositories Are Effective and Safe for Treating Acute Ulcerative Proctitis
dc.type Article
dc.relation.ispartofseries-issue 1
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume 17
dc.collection Публикации сотрудников КФУ
dc.relation.startpage 98
dc.source.id SCOPUS15423565-2019-17-1-SID85049613731


Файлы в этом документе

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

  • Публикации сотрудников КФУ Scopus [24551]
    Коллекция содержит публикации сотрудников Казанского федерального (до 2010 года Казанского государственного) университета, проиндексированные в БД Scopus, начиная с 1970г.

Показать сокращенную информацию

Поиск в электронном архиве


Расширенный поиск

Просмотр

Моя учетная запись

Статистика