Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-22T20:45:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-22T20:45:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1337-8384 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/148609 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018, Slovenska Vzdelavacia Obstaravacia. All rights reserved. The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of art structures of two avant-garde writers. The general category of texts is taken as a basis – the category of absurdity often referred to as "boffinry.» Notwithstanding the traits of similarity, the ways of realization of an art discourse differ, for example, A. Vvedensky has a dominating principle of "semantic nonsense," as well as D. Kharms – "situational nonsense" when there is either a collision of meanings or collision of situations. As a result, it is possible to speak about a conscious asemantism and an art agrammatism in the texts devoted to realize, first of all, the de-constructive function of language. Thus all the elements of standard communication are involved in skillful manipulations by Vvedensky and Kharms. | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | XLinguae | |
dc.subject | Art absurdity | |
dc.subject | Communication violation | |
dc.subject | Function of the nomination | |
dc.subject | Language experiment | |
dc.subject | Semantics | |
dc.title | Lexico-semantic and linguo-stylistical analysis of a. Vvedensky’s and d. kharms’ art texts | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries-issue | 2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume | 11 | |
dc.collection | Публикации сотрудников КФУ | |
dc.relation.startpage | 455 | |
dc.source.id | SCOPUS13378384-2018-11-2-SID85047379450 |