dc.date.accessioned |
2019-01-22T20:45:17Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-01-22T20:45:17Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1337-8384 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/148609 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
© 2018, Slovenska Vzdelavacia Obstaravacia. All rights reserved. The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of art structures of two avant-garde writers. The general category of texts is taken as a basis – the category of absurdity often referred to as "boffinry.» Notwithstanding the traits of similarity, the ways of realization of an art discourse differ, for example, A. Vvedensky has a dominating principle of "semantic nonsense," as well as D. Kharms – "situational nonsense" when there is either a collision of meanings or collision of situations. As a result, it is possible to speak about a conscious asemantism and an art agrammatism in the texts devoted to realize, first of all, the de-constructive function of language. Thus all the elements of standard communication are involved in skillful manipulations by Vvedensky and Kharms. |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
XLinguae |
|
dc.subject |
Art absurdity |
|
dc.subject |
Communication violation |
|
dc.subject |
Function of the nomination |
|
dc.subject |
Language experiment |
|
dc.subject |
Semantics |
|
dc.title |
Lexico-semantic and linguo-stylistical analysis of a. Vvedensky’s and d. kharms’ art texts |
|
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries-issue |
2 |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume |
11 |
|
dc.collection |
Публикации сотрудников КФУ |
|
dc.relation.startpage |
455 |
|
dc.source.id |
SCOPUS13378384-2018-11-2-SID85047379450 |
|