Электронный архив

Planck intermediate results: II. Comparison of sunyaev-zeldovich measurements from planck and from the arcminute microkelvin imager for 11 galaxy clusters

Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.author Ade P.
dc.contributor.author Aghanim N.
dc.contributor.author Arnaud M.
dc.contributor.author Ashdown M.
dc.contributor.author Aumont J.
dc.contributor.author Baccigalupi C.
dc.contributor.author Balbi A.
dc.contributor.author Banday A.
dc.contributor.author Barreiro R.
dc.contributor.author Battaner E.
dc.contributor.author Battye R.
dc.contributor.author Benabed K.
dc.contributor.author Benoît A.
dc.contributor.author Bernard J.
dc.contributor.author Bersanelli M.
dc.contributor.author Bhatia R.
dc.contributor.author Bikmaev I.
dc.contributor.author Böhringer H.
dc.contributor.author Bonaldi A.
dc.contributor.author Bond J.
dc.contributor.author Borrill J.
dc.contributor.author Bouchet F.
dc.contributor.author Bourdin H.
dc.contributor.author Brown M.
dc.contributor.author Bucher M.
dc.contributor.author Burenin R.
dc.contributor.author Burigana C.
dc.contributor.author Butler R.
dc.contributor.author Cabella P.
dc.contributor.author Carvalho P.
dc.contributor.author Catalano A.
dc.contributor.author Cayón L.
dc.contributor.author Chamballu A.
dc.contributor.author Chary R.
dc.contributor.author Chiang L.
dc.contributor.author Chon G.
dc.contributor.author Clements D.
dc.contributor.author Colafrancesco S.
dc.contributor.author Colombi S.
dc.contributor.author Coulais A.
dc.contributor.author Crill B.
dc.contributor.author Cuttaia F.
dc.contributor.author Da Silva A.
dc.contributor.author Dahle H.
dc.contributor.author Davies R.
dc.contributor.author Davis R.
dc.contributor.author De Bernardis P.
dc.contributor.author De Gasperis G.
dc.contributor.author De Rosa A.
dc.contributor.author De Zotti G.
dc.contributor.author Delabrouille J.
dc.contributor.author Démoclès J.
dc.contributor.author Dickinson C.
dc.contributor.author Diego J.
dc.contributor.author Dolag K.
dc.contributor.author Dole H.
dc.contributor.author Donzelli S.
dc.contributor.author Doré O.
dc.contributor.author Douspis M.
dc.contributor.author Dupac X.
dc.contributor.author Efstathiou G.
dc.contributor.author Enßlin T.
dc.contributor.author Eriksen H.
dc.contributor.author Feroz F.
dc.contributor.author Finelli F.
dc.contributor.author Flores-Cacho I.
dc.contributor.author Forni O.
dc.contributor.author Fosalba P.
dc.contributor.author Frailis M.
dc.contributor.author Franceschi E.
dc.contributor.author Fromenteau S.
dc.contributor.author Galeotta S.
dc.contributor.author Ganga K.
dc.contributor.author Génova-Santos R.
dc.contributor.author Giard M.
dc.contributor.author Giraud-Héraud Y.
dc.contributor.author González-Nuevo J.
dc.contributor.author Górski K.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-18T20:01:41Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-18T20:01:41Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.issn 0004-6361
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/135864
dc.description.abstract A comparison is presented of Sunyaev-Zeldovich measurements for 11 galaxy clusters as obtained by Planck and by the ground-based interferometer, the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager. Assuming a universal spherically-symmetric Generalised Navarro, Frenk and White (GNFW) model for the cluster gas pressure profile, we jointly constrain the integrated Compton-Y parameter (Y 500) and the scale radius (θ500) of each cluster. Our resulting constraints in the Y500-θ500 2D parameter space derived from the two instruments overlap significantly for eight of the clusters, although, overall, there is a tendency for AMI to find the Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal to be smaller in angular size and fainter than Planck. Significant discrepancies exist for the three remaining clusters in the sample, namely A1413, A1914, and the newly-discovered Planck cluster PLCKESZ G139.59+24.18. The robustness of the analysis of both the Planck and AMI data is demonstrated through the use of detailed simulations, which also discount confusion from residual point (radio) sources and from diffuse astrophysical foregrounds as possible explanations for the discrepancies found. For a subset of our cluster sample, we have investigated the dependence of our results on the assumed pressure profile by repeating the analysis adopting the best-fitting GNFW profile shape which best matches X-ray observations. Adopting the best-fitting profile shape from the X-ray data does not, in general, resolve the discrepancies found in this subset of five clusters. Though based on a small sample, our results suggest that the adopted GNFW model may not be sufficiently flexible to describe clusters universally. © ESO, 2013.
dc.relation.ispartofseries Astronomy and Astrophysics
dc.subject Cosmic background radiation
dc.subject Cosmology: observations
dc.subject Galaxies: clusters: general
dc.subject Galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium
dc.subject X-rays: galaxies: clusters
dc.title Planck intermediate results: II. Comparison of sunyaev-zeldovich measurements from planck and from the arcminute microkelvin imager for 11 galaxy clusters
dc.type Review
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume 550
dc.collection Публикации сотрудников КФУ
dc.source.id SCOPUS00046361-2013-550-SID84873684603


Файлы в этом документе

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

  • Публикации сотрудников КФУ Scopus [24551]
    Коллекция содержит публикации сотрудников Казанского федерального (до 2010 года Казанского государственного) университета, проиндексированные в БД Scopus, начиная с 1970г.

Показать сокращенную информацию

Поиск в электронном архиве


Расширенный поиск

Просмотр

Моя учетная запись

Статистика