Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor.author | Sagitov A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Shabalina K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Li H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Magid E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-05T07:10:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-05T07:10:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/130307 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2017 The Authors. Fiducial marker systems consist of patterns that are placed in environment for miscellaneous applications and are further automatically detected with cameras. A variety of applications determines the criteria, which characterize qualitative properties of a marker and include such evaluation benchmarks as resilience to occlusion, distance to a marker, false positive and false negative rates, sensitivity to illumination, and others. The paper compares existing ARTag, AprilTag, and CALTag systems utilizing a high fidelity camera, which is a main vision sensor of a full-size Russian humanoid robot AR-601M. In experiments the comparison of the three marker systems reliability and detection rate in occlusions of various types and intensities was verified. Finally, a preferable for AR-601M robot visual applications marker system was selected. | |
dc.title | Effects of rotation and systematic occlusion on fiducial marker recognition | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries-volume | 113 | |
dc.collection | Публикации сотрудников КФУ | |
dc.source.id | SCOPUS-2017-113-SID85021387338 |