Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor | Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет | |
dc.contributor.author | Zapata Francisco | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kosheleva Olga | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kreinovich Vladik | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-24T12:26:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-24T12:26:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/117775 | |
dc.description.abstract | We always teach students that cramming for a test is a bad idea, that they should study at the same speed throughout the semester - but many still cram. We ourselves are not that different: when we prepare papers for a conference, we often "cram" in the last days before the deadline instead of working with a regular speed for the whole time before the conference. The ubiquity of cramming makes us think that maybe it is not necessarily always a bad idea. And indeed, a simple model of a study process shows that an optimal solution often involve some cramming - to be more precise, a study schedule, in which in some periods we study much more intensely than in other periods, is often more efficient than studying at the same speed. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Н.И. ЛОБАЧЕВСКИЙ И МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В РОССИИ | ru_RU |
dc.subject | cramming | en_US |
dc.subject | optimal study schedule | en_US |
dc.subject | mathematical model of a study schedule | en_US |
dc.subject | regular speed vs bursts | en_US |
dc.title | MAYBE THE USUAL STUDENTS' PRACTICE OF CRAMMING FOR A TEST MAKES SENSE: A MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.udk | 378 | |
dc.description.pages | 195-198 |