dc.contributor |
Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zapata Francisco |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Kosheleva Olga |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Kreinovich Vladik |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-01-24T12:26:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-01-24T12:26:31Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/117775 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We always teach students that cramming for a test is a bad idea, that they should study at the same speed throughout the semester - but many still cram. We ourselves are not that different: when we prepare papers for a conference, we often "cram" in the last days before the deadline instead of working with a regular speed for the whole time before the conference. The ubiquity of cramming makes us think that maybe it is not necessarily always a bad idea. And indeed, a simple model of a study process shows that an optimal solution often involve some cramming - to be more precise, a study schedule, in which in some periods we study much more intensely than in other periods, is often more efficient than studying at the same speed. |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Н.И. ЛОБАЧЕВСКИЙ И МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЕ
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В РОССИИ |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
cramming |
en_US |
dc.subject |
optimal study schedule |
en_US |
dc.subject |
mathematical model of a study schedule |
en_US |
dc.subject |
regular speed vs bursts |
en_US |
dc.title |
MAYBE THE USUAL STUDENTS' PRACTICE OF CRAMMING FOR A TEST MAKES SENSE:
A MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
|
dc.identifier.udk |
378 |
|
dc.description.pages |
195-198 |
|