How grammar links concepts: verb-mediated constructions, attribution, perspectivizing
Human cognitive processing ;, 57./ Friedrich Ungerer.

Ungerer  Friedrich

Главная
→
EBSCO eBook (только для КФУ)
→
Полнотекстовая коллекция книг EBSCO eBook
→
Просмотр элемента

dc.contributor.author	Ungerer Friedrich
dc.date.accessioned	2024-01-29T21:31:42Z
dc.date.available	2024-01-29T21:31:42Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.identifier.citation	Ungerer. How grammar links concepts: verb-mediated constructions, attribution, perspectivizing Human cognitive processing ;, 57. - 1 online resource. - URL: https://libweb.kpfu.ru/ebsco/pdf/1572182.pdf
dc.identifier.isbn	9789027265784 (pdf, ePub)
dc.identifier.isbn	902726578X (pdf, ePub)
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/179537
dc.description	Includes bibliographical references and index.
dc.description.abstract	The proposed framework of 'concept linking' combines insights of construction grammar with those of traditional functional descriptions to explain particularly challenging but often neglected areas of English grammar such as negation, modality, adverbials and non-finite constructions. To reach this goal the idea of a unified network of constructions is replaced by the triad of verb-mediated constructions, attribution and scope-based perspectivizing, each of them understood as a syntactically effective concept-linking mechanism in its own right, but involved in interfaces with the other mechanisms. In addition, 'concept linking' supplies a novel approach to early child language. It casts fresh light on widely accepted descriptions of early two-word utterances and verb islands in usage-based models of language acquisition and encourages a new view of children's 'mistakes'.
dc.description.tableofcontents	How Grammar Links Concepts; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; List of figures; List of tables; Chapter 1. Introduction; 1.1 The present situation; 1.2 Revived insights of traditional functionalism; 1.3 The contribution of image schemas; 1.4 The role of perspectives; 1.5 A first summary of concept-linking mechanisms; 1.6 The role of interfaces; 1.7 Concept linking and language acquisition; 1.8 The structure of the book; 1.9 The status of the examples; Chapter 2. Mechanisms of concept linking; 2.1 Verb-mediated constructions (VMCs); 2.1.1 Agent-driven VMCs
dc.description.tableofcontents	2.1.2 Other types of VMCs2.2 Attribution; 2.2.1 Attribution as modifying; 2.2.2 Attribution as circumstancing; 2.2.3 Attribution in complex sentences; 2.3 Perspectivizing and scope phenomena; 2.3.1 Sentence modes as grammaticalized perspectives; 2.3.2 Deixis, agreement, and TAM perspectives; 2.3.3 Negation, perspective, and the grammaticalization of scope; 2.3.4 Perspectivizing use of adverbs; 2.4 The inherent meaning of scope and attribution; 2.5 Evidence for concept linking in spoken language; 2.6 A first overview of concept-linking mechanisms
dc.description.tableofcontents	2.7 Postscript on concept linking and image schemas2.7.1 Relationship of path, container, and part-whole to other image schemas; 2.7.2 The spatial background of image schemas; 2.7.3 Neurological claims for image schemas; Chapter 3. Hierarchy in concept linking; 3.1 Introductory remarks on grammatical hierarchies; 3.2 VMC and attribution hierarchies; 3.2.1 The 'flatness' of the VMC hierarchy; 3.2.2 The hierarchical flexibility of attribution; 3.3 Hierarchical aspects of perspectivizing and scope; 3.3.1 Hierarchical levels; 3.3.2 Scope differentiation for viewpoint and person-oriented adverbs
dc.description.tableofcontents	3.3.3 Scope hierarchy vs. scope competition: How time and frequency adverbs, emphasizers and not-negation function3.3.4 The scope behavior of epistemic and deontic modals; 3.4 Interlocking hierarchies: An example; 3.5 Postscript on the notions of clause and complex sentence; 3.5.1 The notion of clause; 3.5.2 The notion of complex sentence; Chapter 4. Restrictions on concept linking; 4.1 Restrictions on VMCs and attribution contrasted; 4.2 Restrictions on perspectivizing; Chapter 5. Signaling concept linking: Word order, morphology, function words
dc.description.tableofcontents	5.1 The role of word order in concept linking5.1.1 A preliminary classification; 5.1.2 Word order as serialization of concept representations; 5.1.3 Word order as adjacency of concept representations; 5.1.4 Word order as indication of scope extension and the position of scope signals; 5.2 The role of morphology and function words in concept linking; 5.3 Word order, morphology and function words: An overview; Chapter 6. Concept linking, topic, comment and focusing; 6.1 Introductory remarks on the influence of conceptual salience and informational prominence
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Human cognitive processing. 57
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Human cognitive processing ;. 57.
dc.subject.other	Grammar, Comparative and general -- Syntax.
dc.subject.other	Cognitive grammar.
dc.subject.other	Psycholinguistics.
dc.subject.other	Cognitive grammar.
dc.subject.other	Grammar, Comparative and general -- Syntax.
dc.subject.other	Psycholinguistics.
dc.subject.other	LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Grammar & Punctuation
dc.subject.other	LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
dc.subject.other	Electronic books.
dc.title	How grammar links concepts: verb-mediated constructions, attribution, perspectivizing Human cognitive processing ;, 57./ Friedrich Ungerer.
dc.type	Book
dc.description.pages	1 online resource.
dc.collection	Электронно-библиотечные системы
dc.source.id	EN05CEBSCO05C1122